|
































| |
CHAPTER 2
1928 - 1931
hornton Heath was a
suburb of Croydon, which itself was then a Borough in the county of
Surrey though it is now part of Greater London. The status of Borough
entitled Croydon to manage most of its own affairs, including
Education, independently of the Surrey County Council. By 1928
Croydon had become virtually joined to London by continuous building
development, but the boundary between Norbury, in Croydon, and
Streatham, in London, was still marked and the Borough boasted an
identity not unlike that of a County Town, with a proper civic
pride.
I never discovered where the Heath
was, or had been, since the area was almost solid housing, apart from
a recreation ground and a small but pleasant wooded area called
Grange Park, situated on a hill. It is true that when we moved there,
the remains of a small farm adjoined our road; but this was very
shortly built over. Thornton Heath Pond was then still a real pond, a
landmark and bus and tram stop; and some road names carried
impressions of times long past, such as Bensham Manor Road and
Colliers Water Lane, the latter (so our teachers told us) referring
to an opencast coal mine which once existed there.
Our house was No 7, Berne Road, which
formed one side of a square of roads with similarly attractive Swiss
names - Geneva, Zermatt and Lucerne. Zermatt and Lucerne houses were
pre-1914 but Berne and Geneva were modern in the sense that they were
smaller, cheaper and less well built. However, after Stronza Road it
was all quite heavenly, especially the small garden. Ours was in a
terrace of five, rented of course, since purchase was neither
possible nor thought particularly desirable in those days. The
landlords, who had bought the house as an investment, were a
childless couple called George and Clare Phillips, who owned a sweet
shop in Bermondsey and were destined to play a small but significant
part in our lives.
My parents named the house "Ralvera"
for obvious reasons and we even had a glazed sign proclaiming this
fact. We also shortly acquired a black puppy of dubious parentage
called Gyp and among the archives is a picture of myself aged about 8
with Gyp, standing beneath this sign. (Insert picture?)
Vera and I actually had
bedrooms to ourselves, a luxury not enjoyed by many young people.
Mine was the smallest, while Vera had the back bedroom overlooking
the garden and the blank wall of the first house in Geneva Road,
until she got married and left home, after which my father moved or
was banished into it on grounds of his truly horrendous
snoring.
Fireplaces
Like all houses until well after the
Second World War, it had fireplaces in both of the downstairs living
rooms and the two larger bedrooms. Coal was the sole form of space
heating and only rarely were fires lit upstairs. However, I do
remember being ill on one occasion and enjoying the luxury of a real
coal fire in my parents' bedroom, to which I was moved. There was a
rudimentary back boiler in one fireplace downstairs for heating water
but it was both inefficient and noisy, so the common method was to
heat small quantities of water in a kettle or saucepan and larger
amounts in a gas-copper holding 12-15 gallons, which had to be
conveyed upstairs somehow for bathing purposes. With recollections of
larger Edwardian houses in mind, my mother used to call the large
back room the "kitchen" and the small cooking/washing-up room the
"scullery". The other living room was simply the "front room" to us,
but called the "parlour" by our more pretentious neighbours. "Lounge"
was unheard of. Although all rooms were quite small, people often
kept the parlour unused except for the most important family
occasions, a practice which happily my parents scorned and we used
every inch of the house to the full.
The back garden was quite small but
to a child who had never known such a thing it was a second home to
me and I spent a great deal of time in it. There was also a covered
area attached to the back of the house, with a rudimentary work-bench
where I made or dismantled articles in the endless quest for
knowledge displayed by most boys. Its great advantage to my mother
was that the resulting mess was kept out of the house.
School
I now joined the Infants at
Ecclesbourne Road School, some quarter of a mile away. I walked there
of course, as we all did. There was little traffic on side roads in
those days, though crossing them was not entirely without danger and
there was the odd casualty. Life in the Infants was clearly placid
because I remember hardly anything about it except my teacher's name,
Miss Wakelyn, and also being caught playing truant one day. However,
one notable event was establishing a friendship with a boy 12 months
my senior who lived in Zermatt Road. It was then 1927; I was five
years old and he six. His name was Derek Robinson and he is a friend
today, 65 years later at the time of writing.
I graduated at the age of 7 to the
"Big Boys" (nowadays called a Primary or Junior School), where there
were eight classes of fifty or more children. Boys occupied the
ground floor and girls the upper floor, each having separate
entrances and playgrounds. So well segregated were we that the Girls'
School made no impact on our lives or my recollection. The plan
appeared to be to put brighter boys in the even-numbered classes and
others in the odd numbers. I was in the former. In reality the
division was between those who had good, stable homes and parents who
took an interest in education, and those who did not. Some children
came from frightful homes where poverty, overcrowding and ignorance
made staying alive and unhurt the essential aims in life. As a child
I was vaguely aware of my advantages; but like all children (and most
adults) I accepted this as being due to some superiority on my
part.
In point of fact, the catchment area
was such that the range of both money and ability was quite wide.
Some boys' families were distinctly better off than mine, though most
were not. We did, however, have a slight but crucial advantage over
most of our neighbours in that my mother possessed a small income of
her own. This derived from her father, one William Morton, who had
been a successful hay salesman in Vauxhall, London, until his
untimely death in 1896 after falling under a wagon on Tower Bridge.
His three younger children - my aunt, Nell, my mother, May, and my
uncle, Leonard - were left in a parlous situation but a good friend
of their father, named Atkins, collected all the bad debts and
disposed of the business profitably. The proceeds were used to
purchase some small labourers' cottages in Clapham, the rents from
which educated the children and gave them a small income for life.
Wisely, Mr Atkins placed the estate in trust for the two girls,
without which it would inevitably have been frittered away on some
business venture of their respective husbands. Unwisely, he made a
relation called Mr Sangs the trustee. This gentleman milked the
proceeds disgracefully and my earliest recollections are of my
mother's efforts to get her quarterly allowance out of "Old Mouldy
Mug", as he was disrespectfully but deservedly known, and she
frequently took me with her by bus to his house at Clapham Common to
belabour him in person.
Rich and poor
Nevertheless, the money did make the
difference between rubbing along and real poverty when my father was
out of work, and we never went short of food. It is hard to believe
that people starved to death in the richest country in the world,
with an Empire which held sovereignty over one quarter of the
population of the planet. But they did. Later, in Grammar School, a
much respected and philanthropic history master named King (though we
called him Smiler for reasons which were totally obscure) urged us
when we grew up to ask why coal cost fifteen shillings a ton to buy
but miners got only fourpence a ton for digging it out; and why over
two hundred people had died of starvation that year according to
official records.
In those early days, children's major
pastime was playing in the street with one's friends or, if it was
wet, in each others' houses. I had two particular friends who lived
close by, one called Wilfred Lyons and the other Martin Matthews,
later to die in a burning Lancaster bomber. The Lyons family were
quiet, easy-going working class people and always made me welcome
along with other companions of their four children. I spent many
happy hours playing billiards on the full-sized table which almost
completely filled their living room; sadly, I allowed the skill to
lapse. They also often listened to Radio Luxemburg, a commercial
station beaming programmes and advertisements in English from that
small European state and the only one of its kind competing with the
BBC until well after the Second World War. Ovaltine, Horlicks and
popular medicines were the most common advertisements - Ovaltine with
its "We are the Ovalteenies, happy girls and boys", and Horlicks with
its advice to avoid "night starvation" were repeated so often that
they were imprinted permanently on our brains. Ball games figured
prominently out of doors, mostly concerned with throwing, catching or
hitting someone with it. Conventional team games such as soccer and
cricket were not much favoured and I have to confess that I have
never acquired much interest in either of them. On the other hand, I
developed and retain a quick eye for relative movement and even today
can still catch a ball instinctively. To say that we were street
urchins is going too far, though we certainly made a dreadful noise
running about shouting and bawling. However, parents and neighbours
(most of whom also had children, of course) must have been more
tolerant in those days, or perhaps it was simply the case that
anything was better than having us under their feet indoors. A
popular game was bouncing a ball as high as possible up the
windowless wall of an end house, until the demented occupants came
and screamed dire imprecations at us. A common threat was to tell our
parents, not an empty one in days when people were concerned about
their image in the community and did not take complaints about their
children as a personal insult, as many do today. The ultimate, and
invariably effective, deterrent was to say they would call a
policeman. The "bobby on the beat" was much more in evidence then and
exercised a powerful restraining influence on public
behaviour.
Winter darkness inhibited our
activities somewhat but we enjoyed its soft concealment and would go
out in the street as often and for as long as our parents allowed. We
had no fear of molestation by adults, though larger boys were best
avoided. In summer a girl or two would sometimes join us but rarely
after dark until we were all somewhat older. I still recall the
street lamp-lighter who would go round on his bicycle with a long
pole, magically touching each gas lamp which would spring into golden
life; but soon these were replaced by electric lamps and the
lamplighter passed into history along with the "link man" of earlier
times. The night watchman guarding road works in winter was also a
wonderful sight, huddled against his coke brazier which he stoked to
white-heat. He would be pleased to have someone to talk to until we
were eventually summoned to bed, leaving him to the dark, silent
streets.
Catapults
As we grew older, we developed a new
and rather anti-social activity. We discovered, or were taught, how
to fashion a catapult out of a bicycle spoke. With elastic bands and
a small leather pouch, these deadly implements could be concealed in
the palm of one's hand. They fired round airgun pellets with
astonishing accuracy and effect, and a popular competition involved
several of us taking five rounds rapid fire at one of the metal cowls
which adorned many local chimneys and whose purpose was to swivel
away from the wind direction and thus prevent smoke from gusting back
into the living room. The unearthly and incomprehensible din would
bring the occupants out to gaze at their roofs while we either stood
with cherubic countenances pretending ignorance or, if rumbled, beat
a hasty retreat.
These catapults were precision
instruments and we became skilled at making them. Occasionally we
turned them on each other's bare legs but this was highly painful and
each "ping" left a small blue bruise, so the practice was generally
frowned upon. Others outside the circle were not so lucky but one had
to be careful not to be caught as the wrath of the pinged one was
terrible to behold.
One day I made a "Big Bertha" (so
named after a giant gun with which the Germans bombarded Paris in
World War I) out of thick fencing wire, powered by two Hoover cleaner
rubber drive belts. This fired pebbles an inch or more across. It was
quite impossible to hold the device and pull the elastic at the same
time so I had to wedge the handle in a fence while pulling with both
hands. Like the real Big Bertha, its scope was limited. During a
temporary feud with Wilf I endeavoured to show my displeasure at his
leering insults over the four widths of garden from my house to his
by loosing a round in his direction. He, quick as a cat, had ample
time to take evasive action. Not so the house behind him, and I
watched with horror as the missile sped high over where Wilf's
obnoxious head had been to crash on the slates of his neighbour's
roof.
The reader will gather that when I
complain about children's behaviour today I am being grossly unfair.
On the other hand, I do not recall anyone who had a vicious or
destructive nature enjoying evil for its own sake, and our escapades
were mostly sheer mischievousness. Indeed, we had a strong, if
sometimes misguided, sense of justice and fair play.
At school things were different. A
rigid discipline was maintained at all times, reinforced by cuffs
about the head and liberal use of the cane. This was not then
regarded as in any way harsh, undignified, inhuman, or damaging to
our tender sensibilities and likely to cause us to grow into sadistic
brutes. Nor did it. On the contrary, the saying "spare the rod and
spoil the child" was held to be an ancient truth and canes for
thwacking children would be displayed in shops to encourage parents
to do their duty. The parents of some of my friends had, and used,
such a deterrent; my own, I'm glad to say, did not subscribe to the
practice. The reader must judge whether a valuable formative element
to my character was thereby omitted.
A single cane served the whole school
(apart from the Headmaster, who had a private stock of them) and a
delinquent was sharply told to "get the stick and black book",
whereupon he must go from classroom to classroom knocking on the
door, waiting to be admitted and stuttering out his request, hoping
desperately that it was not there. Of course, in the end it was there
and he was forced to clutch it to him and creep back to his classroom
where his comrades would sit back with brazen satisfaction, not to
say pleasure, at the prospect of pain being administered to a fellow
human being. This ritual punishment was applied with vigour
regardless of age, leaving angry blue weals on the victim's hands.
There was a myth, of the kind which young children accept as gospel
truth, that rubbing one's hands with orange peel would cause the cane
instantly to break; and inevitably there were those who swore that
they had seen it happen. But it never did.
Empire
School was not meant to be a
particularly comfortable or homely place but if you were reasonably
well favoured it was bearable. Even so, I remember how often I would
go home seething at the unfairness and lack of feeling of one
teacher, aptly named Miss Birch; my mother's utter indifference to
the whole subject merely increased my indignation. No doubt Miss
Birch had plenty to exasperate her. I remember her screaming at the
boy sitting beside me who, instead of listening to her, was
blissfully drawing a face in ink with a steel-nibbed pen upon the tip
of his private part. And I can still see her taking such exception to
a crayon drawing by Wilf that she seized the paper and rubbed it
violently all over his face. He emerged looking like a Red Indian. We
learned a lot about British (mostly English) heroes like Drake,
Nelson and Wellington, and were regaled with stories and poems of
heroic feats of arms in our Island history, such as the Battles of
Trafalgar and Waterloo, and the Charge of the Light Brigade in the
Crimean War; it would have been unheard of even to question any of
them, still less to debunk them in the fashion of today. We were, in
short, British, self-evidently superior to all other nations, and our
Empire was a totally desirable and praiseworthy institution, blessed
and approved by the Almighty, to which its millions of subject
peoples were eternally grateful to belong. And so they should be.
Indeed any of them who sought to oppose us by force were rightly
caught and, if necessary, disposed of, and no-one seemed to think
this the slightest bit unfair.
A map of the Empire adorned every
wall, together with a series of paintings showing how the Royal Mail
was carried to its farthermost reaches, illustrating the benefits of
a peaceful, orderly and civilised way of life which the British had
brought to so much of mankind. And I remember with what pride the
whole school was paraded in the playground to see the British Airship
R101 floating gracefully overhead, large as an ocean liner, just
weeks before it crashed in France on the 5th October 1930 with the
loss of almost everyone on board.
Crazes
At a certain time each year, no-one
knew why, the school playground was given over to games with
cigarette cards - fag cards to us - of which every child collected
large quantities unless his parents belonged the small and distinctly
peculiar minority of non-smokers. The buttresses of the school wall
afforded recesses in each of which enterprising boys would set up
stalls and invite others to undertake skilled tasks with a
well-skated cigarette card. A typical game required one to knock down
a 1-inch wood screw standing on end or to cover a halfpenny with the skated
card, and odds of up to 10 cards to 1 would be offered. Then
suddenly the craze would die and something else would take its place.
Spinning-tops were a popular and regular event. They were of two
kinds, whip tops and peg tops. The former were raised to prodigious
speeds by whipping them with a string tied to a stick, and they could
be persuaded to perform remarkable aerial feats in skilled hands. The
latter, beautifully made of box-wood, were carefully bound with a
piece of twine and then deftly hurled to the ground where they would
spin for ages, the twine remaining in one's hand.
Other games were dictated by the
season, notably conkers and sliding on ice. Conkers is, I believe,
still as popular today as it was then, though possibly meeting with
less adult approval. Children would desecrate local horse-chestnut
trees to obtain prize specimens of the beautiful waxy brown globes,
and gaze in awe at a famed "twelver" or more (which had probably been
baked surreptitiously in an oven to make it hard as iron). We must
have had some very cold winters because playground slides were a
regular feature and were formed by skilled little feet into lethal
Cresta Runs twenty or thirty yards long. Groups of boys would run as
fast as they could, then leap onto the slide and sail gracefully to
its end. Teachers rarely put a stop to this, possibly on the basis
that we were learning social and physical skills of a high order but
more probably because it kept us occupied; and if some of us suffered
grievous cuts and bruises, that too could be regarded as a useful
introduction to the perils of life.
Transport
Citizens old and young were
accustomed to walking or cycling appreciable distances to get to
work, school or shops; but public transport was also readily
available in the shape of frequent buses or trams serving the main
roads, while the Southern Electric Railway provided a wide network of
lines covering South London with a similarly reliable service. Our
usual journey was to the shopping centre of Croydon, for which
purpose we used Route 42 of Croydon Tramways, a fleet of lumbering
top-heavy vehicles run by the Council and plying between Thornton
Heath High Street and the Greyhound Hotel, a distance of about five
miles along just two roads. The service they provided was reasonably
good considering that they laboured under certain difficulties. One
of these was the need to reverse direction at the end of each
journey, requiring the electricity pick-up pole to be moved from one
overhead line to the other, an operation calling for skill and
patience. Another was a regrettable tendency to come off the rails,
blocking the track and leaving a trail of immobile trams and incensed
would-be travellers. This was a particular hazard at Thornton Heath
Pond where they had to perform a sharp right-angle turn from
Brigstock Road into London Road and in the process join or leave the
tracks of the No 16 and 18 tram services, which ran from the Thames
Embankment in London right down to Purley, on the Brighton
Road.
Drivers of No 42 trams had very
little protection at all from the elements. They stood with gloves,
caps, greatcoats and goggles facing the oncoming rain or sleet and I
can still see them now, stamping their feet and clapping their arms
round their bodies against the bitter cold. Drivers of the trams from
London, on the other hand, had a roof over their heads and glass
screens around them, enabling them to stand in relative luxury. These
were later fitted to the No 42 trams as well. None
sat down throughout the journey, because there was nothing to sit on.
The ultimate and, some said, unnecessary luxury of a seat for the
driver appeared only in a sleek new vehicle which was introduced
shortly before the war. Lower-deck passengers had a modicum of
upholstery but those upstairs had only hard wooden seats. Prominently
displayed were notices saying "Do Not Spit. Penalty 40 shillings" -
an interesting reflection of the habits of our forebears but happily
rare by my time. The size of the penalty, being best part of a week's
wages for many people, showed the determination of the authorities to
stamp out a practice which had been recently recognised as
contributing to the spread of tuberculosis.
The road from London was very
straight for long stretches and the great trams were capable of quite
extraordinary speeds along them. Because tram rails were embedded in
the ground, they were welded together and the wheels could glide
smoothly over them without the "diddly-da" of expansion gaps which
railway lines then required. No words can describe the thrill for a
small boy of standing on the conductor's platform as the swaying
monster hurtled effortlessly along, with the wheel on its pick-up
pole screaming defiance to the world, until some fool wanted to get
off and rang the bell. Its loud clang would be followed by the
scraping of iron brakes on iron wheels and a mournful protesting wail
from below as the gears changed from driving to driven mode, until
the massive contraption came to a grinding, shuddering halt, and the
spell was broken. As traffic increased, trams became a source of
frustration to other road users since their tracks lay in the centre
of the carriageway and passengers had to stream across the road to
get aboard. All other traffic was required by law to stop and give
way. The practice of forming a queue, now a distinguishing feature of
the British throughout the world, was practically unknown before
World War 2 and to have to wait while a milling crowd of blockheads
fought to climb onto their clumsy vehicle in rain or snow was more
than the average motorist could endure. London's tramways with their
fixed tracks were eventually seen to be causing more congestion than
they relieved, and were done away with in 1952; but with them went a
way of life and a tradition of service which was never quite
replaced. They still remain in many parts of the world, providing
cheap, pollution-free transport for the masses.
|